Consequence
Action, target, material parameters, tenant/environment, and destination where relevant.
Strix Production Execution Evaluation
Bring us one consequential action your AI cannot be allowed to get wrong.
We define the exact consequence, map the declared execution estate, establish the authority and current-state conditions required for execution, place the action behind an enforceable boundary, attempt to break the control, and return independently readable evidence of the result.
$30,000 base30 daysOne consequence familyOne primary production system
Start with the action
What can the agent technically do that you are not yet comfortable letting it do autonomously?
The engagement does not begin with broad AI governance. It begins when the consequence can be named precisely enough to define what must be true before it is allowed to happen.
Refund or credit issuance
Claim submission
Regulated-data release
Customer-account mutation
MCP or tool write
Production deployment
Record deletion
Other credentialed external action
What we freeze before the decisive run
Authority
Who may authorize, quorum, scope limits, expiry, delegation, and replay/consumption semantics.
Standing
What must still be true at execution time, which source is authoritative, and how unavailable or conflicting state fails.
Execution estate
Declared routes, tools, handlers, credentials, known exclusions, and the exact claim ceiling.
What we test
The boundary has to survive falsifiers.
The exact matrix is consequence-specific. Typical cells include a valid positive control, payload mutation, wrong target, replay, expired or revoked authority, current-state change, alternate declared route, and required-state unavailability. Not every engagement needs every cell.
What you receive
- ✓Frozen evaluation contract
- ✓Execution-estate map
- ✓Execution covenant
- ✓Production-quality boundary for the agreed scope
- ✓Consequence-specific adversarial test matrix
- ✓Decisive run with favorable and unfavorable results preserved
- ✓Independent verification instructions
- ✓Claims/evidence matrix and residual-risk register
- ✓Executive readout and production recommendation
A PASS is not guaranteed
A valid negative result is still a successful evaluation.
CONTROL ESTABLISHED
The examined action can operate under the frozen covenant and declared execution scope.
ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE REQUIRED
The architecture is viable, but specific control or evidence gaps remain before reliance.
NOT SUITABLE
The action cannot presently support the agreed execution-control standard.
The evaluation does not claim universal agent safety, discovery of every possible execution route, model correctness, regulatory compliance, insurance eligibility, reduced premiums, or protection against a party already holding unrestricted native credentials.
The decision you get
Can this exact autonomous action be governed at execution — and what evidence supports that conclusion?
We do not ask you to replace your agent stack. Give us one consequence. The engagement ends with the control result, its claim ceiling, the evidence another party can inspect, and the residual gaps that remain.
Bring us one consequential action